Every day, you and your team navigate the complexities of training. It’s challenging because scheduling workshops or other designated times for learning pull employees away from their work.

The reality is that our brains struggle to retain information from one-time sessions, conversations, or readings. Despite our best efforts, most of what is learned in these settings is quickly forgotten. This isn’t due to a lack of engagement or interest; it’s simply how our brains function.

For learning to truly stick and be applied effectively in the right situations, continuous reinforcement is essential. However, Talent Development professionals can’t be present in every situation to ensure concepts are reinforced. Managers often lack the tools and expertise to effectively embed these learnings into daily work routines. This gap highlights the need for a new approach to development—one that integrates learning seamlessly into the flow of work, providing ongoing, relevant reinforcement exactly when it’s needed.

What if learning didn’t require stepping away from work but instead enhanced it? People need insights and development opportunities to appear organically within their workflow so that learning is continuous, contextual, and immediately relevant. This approach not only respects the demands on your team’s time but also ensures that development is a natural part of their daily routine.

Why should productivity and personal development compete? In this article, we’ll explore the possibility of integrating learning into daily activities to help resolve the tension that can arise between prioritizing productivity and development.

The Development/Productivity Paradox

Employees often see development as a distraction from their core responsibilities, viewing training as an interruption rather than an enhancement. This perception highlights the development/productivity paradox. The 70-20-10 model reveals that effective growth happens when learning is integrated into daily tasks. Learning must be embedded into the workflow so that development becomes a natural extension of daily work. Continuous reinforcement ensures that new knowledge is immediately applied so that retention and meaningful behavior change occur.

The Challenges of Traditional Learning Methods

The Old Way Isn’t Working: 4 Common Pitfalls of Traditional Learning Strategies Traditional learning methods often fail to deliver sustainable results for several reasons. Workshops and training sessions, while well-intentioned, pull employees away from their daily tasks, creating disruption and information overload.
  • Disruption of Workflow: Scheduled sessions interrupt the flow of daily work, causing productivity dips and backlog. This disruption makes it challenging for employees to balance their work responsibilities with learning commitments.
  • Information Overload: Large volumes of information delivered in a short period can overwhelm employees, leading to poor retention. Studies show that within one hour, learners forget an average of 50% of the information presented; within 24 hours, they forget 70%, and within a week, they forget up to 90% (Bridge) (Indegene).
  • One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Generic training content, normally only specific to roles often fails to address the specific needs and contexts of individual employees. This lack of personalization reduces the effectiveness of learning interventions.
  • Lack of Continuous Reinforcement: Without ongoing support, the skills and knowledge gained in one-time sessions quickly fade. Continuous reinforcement is essential for retention and application of new skills.

What Do These Gaps Mean

  • Retention Rates: According to research, learners forget approximately 70% of new information within 24 hours and 90% within a week without reinforcement (Indegene). This highlights the need for continuous learning strategies to ensure knowledge retention.
  • Engagement Levels: A LinkedIn Learning report found that 58% of employees prefer to learn at their own pace and on-demand, rather than in structured, time-bound sessions (SHIFT). This preference indicates a need for more flexible and personalized learning solutions.
  • Impact of Microlearning: Microlearning, which delivers content in short, focused bursts, has been shown to boost retention rates by 25% to 60%. It also boasts an average completion rate of 82%, making it a highly effective method for engaging learners and improving retention (SHIFT).
These statistics and examples underscore the limitations of traditional learning methods and highlight the need for a new approach that integrates learning seamlessly into the daily workflow, providing continuous, personalized reinforcement exactly when it’s needed.

HUMAN SKILL PROGRAMS ARE HITTING LIMITATIONS...​

Get Strategies To:

What Makes Continuous Learning Effective For An Organization?

Continuous learning means embedding development opportunities directly into the daily workflow. This approach ensures that learning is contextual, personalized, and integrated into the tools employees are already using every day, such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, email, and others. The goal is to make learning a natural, seamless part of the workday, providing real-time, situational coaching that is immediately relevant and actionable.

3 Components That Make Continuous Learning Possible

1. Ongoing Learning Opportunities:

Learning should not be a one-time event but an ongoing process. Continuous learning opportunities ensure that employees can regularly reinforce and build upon their knowledge and skills. Integrating learning directly into daily tools and routines provides constant reinforcement without disrupting workflow.

  • Example: Imagine a project manager receiving daily insights not just on generic leadership skills but specific, personalized guidance on how to best collaborate with individual team members based on their unique personalities and work styles. For instance, they might receive a tip about leveraging the analytical skills of a detail-oriented team member during a planning meeting.

2. Personalized, Contextual Insights:

Providing insights tailored to individual needs and specific situations helps ensure that the learning is relevant and immediately applicable. Personalized coaching can address unique challenges and leverage individual strengths. Cloverleaf’s Automated Coaching™ delivers personalized, context-specific tips that are tailored to the unique psychology and interactions of each user.

  • Example: Imagine a team lead receiving real-time, personalized advice on how to approach a one-on-one meeting with a particular team member. The coaching might suggest ways to motivate that team member based on their personality type, such as recognizing their achievements in a way that aligns with their need for validation.

3. Integration with Daily Tools:

By embedding learning into tools that employees already use the development process becomes a seamless part of their daily workflow. This integration minimizes disruption and maximizes the relevance and impact of the learning.

  • Example: Consider a team receiving coaching tips and developmental insights directly in their workplace tools. For instance, a Slack notification might suggest adjusting communication approaches for an upcoming meeting with a team member who prefers concise, data-driven discussions.

Making Learning In Context A Reality

At Cloverleaf, we’ve redefined continuous learning in the flow of work with Automated Coaching™. Here’s how we excel:

  • Seamless Integration: Learning is embedded into the tools you already use, ensuring a smooth, disruption-free experience.
  • Real-Time Insights: Receive tailored coaching precisely when you need it, aligned with your specific tasks and interactions.
  • Engaging Microlearning: Continuous, bite-sized learning opportunities keep you engaged and enhance retention without overwhelming you.

Automated Coaching Outperforms Traditional Learning Approaches

Maximizing the Impact of Contextual Learning

  • Improved Retention and Application: Ongoing, in-the-moment learning ensures skills are retained and immediately applied.
  • Scalable and Inclusive: Personalized coaching is available to all employees, promoting equal development opportunities across the organization.
  • Proven Impact: Trackable data showcases the tangible improvements in performance and ROI, validating the effectiveness of development initiatives.

Why We Believe Context Makes Continuous Learning Meaningful

At Cloverleaf, our commitment to learning in context is deeply rooted in rigorous research and continuous improvement. Here’s how our studies support this innovative approach:

Research and Commitment to Continuous Improvement

We recently conducted an analysis involving over 100 employees across 12 organizations, focusing on the impact of Automated Coaching™ on team communication and collaboration. The study revealed a 31% increase in these scores after just three months, demonstrating the effectiveness of contextual learning.

Further research with a client showed that engagement with our platform led to an 18% increase in employees feeling their skills were valued, a 36% increase in feeling recognized by team members, and a 36% improvement in perceived teamwork quality. These results underscore how embedding learning into daily workflows enhances both individual and team performance.

In a daily trends analysis, employees who engaged with Cloverleaf showed increased self-awareness and relational energy. This engagement resulted in more stamina, willingness to tackle new challenges, and higher quality teamwork, indicating that learning in context promotes continuous personal and professional growth.

Our qualitative interviews, validated by a global team of PhDs, highlight that users trust Automated Coaching™ for its unbiased, comprehensive insights. This trust facilitates significant improvements in self- and others-awareness, which are crucial for effective communication and collaboration within teams.

Development and Productivity No Longer Need To Compete

Learning doesn’t have to be disruptive. By integrating learning into the daily workflow, leaders can make sure that learning is continuous, personalized, and relevant to what people are doing right now. This approach tackles common problems with traditional training, like interrupting work, overwhelming people with too much information at once, and not being tailored to individual needs.

Key Takeaways:

  • Embedded Learning: Development opportunities should fit seamlessly into the tools and routines that employees already use, minimizing disruption and making learning directly applicable.
  • Continuous Reinforcement: Learning should be an ongoing process with regular reminders and tips to help people retain and apply new knowledge.
  • Personalized Insights: Providing real-time, tailored insights makes learning more effective and relevant to each person’s specific situation.
  • Scalability and Accessibility: Using technology like Automated Coaching™ allows us to offer coaching and development to everyone in the organization, not just a select few.
By adopting a learning-in-context approach, leaders can infuse training organically into their people’s daily workflows. This way, learning is always relevant and timely, providing real-time insights that strengthen productivity and naturally encourage continuous personal growth. Learning in context means every interaction becomes an opportunity for development, making growth a constant and effortless part of your work culture.

In this new era, we need a more scalable and “sticky” way to elevate collaboration across our organizations. It’s imperative. Collaboration is already making or breaking projects and organizations, and with the increasing pace of work, the need for effective collaboration is only growing. We must change our tactics to achieve consistently high-quality collaboration, or our personal and collective success—and wellbeing—will suffer.

Organizations face numerous challenges in this area. By and large, they don’t define, measure, or invest in collaboration effectively. While the term is often used, real investment and measurement reveal a wide variety of gaps. Collaboration, cross-functional teamwork, and related skills are rarely trained for or measured. When training does occur, it’s usually focused on individuals, typically leaders, who are then expected to apply these skills in teams that lack similar training. This siloed approach, if it exists at all, often falls short.

Investing in the quality of collaboration is often relegated to the category of “soft skills,” implying it’s less valuable. This perception persists because the industry hasn’t cracked the code on measuring collaboration effectively and proving its connection to profits. However, focusing on human skills like communication, empathy, and teamwork can transform the way organizations operate. By embedding these skills into daily practices, organizations can strengthen trust, innovation, and agility, ultimately turning human skills into a competitive advantage.

Collaboration Technology Toolshed

The Limitations of Traditional "Collaboration Tools"

In the broader technology market, many products are labeled as “collaboration tools.” However, these tools are mostly just communication or productivity tools. Few, if any, of the software tools currently classified as collaboration actually focus on the human (behavioral) element of collaboration.

Simply providing another channel to communicate doesn’t necessarily improve collaboration. In fact, it can often be a barrier by introducing confusion about where and how to communicate with each other. More channels can be more confusing if there isn’t a shared understanding of which channels to use and when. This often leaves people questioning where to expect a response from teammates. Email, Slack, or text? No one knows.

This Harvard Business Review survey found that while organizations use various tools to share words and files, these tools often fail to enhance true collaborative efforts. The survey revealed that while communication tools facilitate message exchange, they do not necessarily improve the effectiveness of these messages to create shared understanding and meaningful collaboration. We have too many ways to transfer messages and not enough support to build true relationships and quality communication.

We need new tools and approaches that address the work humans do to navigate our differences and achieve outcomes that build true value for the organizations we serve.

Talent Development in the Age of AI

HUMAN SKILL PROGRAMS ARE HITTING LIMITATIONS...​

5 THINGS THIS FREE RESOURCE WILL TEACH YOU
communication tool overload

Growing Collaboration Beyond Communication Tools

Current collaboration tools often fall short because they fail to address the core human elements of collaboration. Here are some specific issues:
  • Overwhelming Channels: Multiple communication platforms can lead to confusion about where to communicate.
  • Lack of Focus on Relationships: Effective collaboration requires tools that foster understanding and relationships, not just message exchanges.
  • Missing the Behavioral Aspect: True collaboration involves navigating human behaviors and differences, which current tools do not adequately support.

The Need for Human-Centered Collaboration Tools

To truly improve collaboration, we need tools that:

1. Facilitate Understanding: Tools should help team members understand each other’s strengths, communication styles, and working preferences right in the flow of work.​ (Josh Bersin)​​​.

2. Build Relationships: Effective collaboration tools should focus on relationship-building and trust. (mckinsey.com)

3. Support Behavioral Changes: Tools should provide insights and nudges that help teams navigate differences and improve their collaborative efforts. Continuous learning and development platforms that offer real-time coaching and feedback can drive sustained behavioral change to improve collaboration​.

Shifting the focus from mere communication to understanding and relationship-building, organizations can unlock the true potential of collaboration.

The Misnomer Of “Soft Skills

Unfortunately, what we’re talking about here is often lumped into a broader category in the organizational context referred to as “soft skills.” This is a really annoying moniker on many levels for those of us who have dedicated our lives to improving people and organizational effectiveness. The word “soft” would seem to imply that it’s less necessary or less relevant than hard skills like software development or financial forecasting. This is also why many in talent management circles have started referring to these soft skills as “human skills”—an even more appropriate moniker in an era of artificial intelligence.

The Soft Skills Disconnect

The Value of Human Skills

CFOs often like to gloss over these investments in soft skill training as frivolous and the most expendable when budget cuts are necessary. This disconnect is illustrated clearly when we examine where we are investing our talent development dollars versus what the organization and its leaders identify as the most critical skills for business success.

Despite the pervasive influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, human skills are the least likely to be displaced or replaced by AI. These skills offer exponential returns on investment compared to the incremental returns of most hard skills. For instance, learning how to use Excel better or adopting a new sales technique might improve efficiency marginally. However, understanding your teammates’ unique strengths can help avoid unnecessary conflicts and navigate differences toward significantly higher performance.

The Return on Investment (ROI) of Human Skills:

  • Conflict Avoidance and Performance: A better understanding of human skills can help teams avoid conflicts and work more harmoniously, leading to higher productivity and better results.
  • Market Relevance: Insights into human skills can guide the development of products and services that better meet customer needs, enhancing market success.
  • Enhanced Customer Interactions: Skills in empathy, communication, and problem-solving improve customer support and sales effectiveness.

3 Challenges of Measuring Human Skills Impact

The disconnect between the investment in development dollars and the types of skills that have an outsized impact on performance boils down to measurement issues.

Challenges in Measuring Collaboration Health:

1. Lack of Standardization: There is no standardized way to measure soft skills across different organizations, making it difficult to benchmark or track progress uniformly.

2. Isolation of Impact: It is challenging to isolate the specific impact of a human skills intervention from other variables that influence performance.

3. Linkage to Financial Success: Drawing a direct and clear line between improvements in human skills and financial metrics like revenue growth or churn rates is complex and often indirect.

Let’s look at each of these in more detail.

1. The Need for Standardized Measurement in Human Skills

When discussing gross margin, businesses can quickly provide a percentage that reflects a standardized calculation. Unfortunately, such standardization for human skills and collaboration metrics is lacking. While we can measure turnover and engagement, how do we quantify collaboration, psychological safety, trust, or leadership?

Measuring Human Capital: SEC’s Steps

The SEC has recognized this gap. On August 26, 2020, they mandated that companies disclose their human capital resources in quarterly and annual reports. This includes any human capital measures or objectives that are key to managing the business.

Trends in Human Capital Reporting

Gibson Dunn’s study on the S&P 500’s compliance reveals significant variability in disclosures:

  • Disclosures ranged from 109 to 1,995 words, averaging 960 words.
  • 25% of companies avoided quantitative metrics, and 10% included only headcount numbers.
  • Significant increases in disclosures on talent attraction, retention, compensation, diversity, health, and pay equity were noted.

There is no standardization in human capital metrics across companies. This variability underscores a lack of understanding of the value human skills bring to organizational success.

The SEC’s requirements are a start, pushing us towards more transparency and investment in people. International standards like ISO 30414 offer some guidance but remain voluntary.

By moving towards standardized measurements for human skills, organizations can better align investments with the factors that drive success, ultimately gaining more actionable insights into their most valuable assets: their people.

2. Isolating the Impact of an Intervention

Organizations invest $350 billion annually in learning and development (L&D) across various interventions, including online courses, in-person training, assessments, coaching, and more. How do we measure the impact of these development opportunities?

Consider an employee named Raj, who improved his performance after participating in multiple programs and moving to a new team with a new manager. How can we determine whether his performance boost was due to the training, the new team, or the new manager?

Current Measurement Practices: Many L&D leaders rely on surveys to gauge effectiveness:

  • Surveys ask if the training was helpful.
  • Surveys ask if managers are effective.
  • Surveys ask if employees feel they have access to needed development programs.

Limitations of Surveys

  • Sentiment vs. Metrics: Surveys measure feelings, not direct ties to business metrics like revenue or turnover.
  • Survey Fatigue: People are tired of surveys, leading to low completion rates.
  • Time-Based Approach: Pre- and post-intervention surveys measure short-term changes, but it’s hard to ensure lasting impact. Studies show that most training knowledge is forgotten within a week.

How can you know if someone’s behavior change will stick? Study after study shows that people forget most of what they learn in training courses within a week. How can development professionals truly measure if their programs create lasting change for months and years?

3. Linking Investments to Financial Success

How do investments in people translate into financial success? While studies show that companies investing in salary, benefits, or L&D are more productive, proving a direct link is tough.

How do investments in people translate into financial success? While studies show that companies investing in salary, benefits, or L&D are more productive, proving a direct link is tough. Demonstrating the ROI of collaboration is even harder. Before Organizational Network Analysis (ONA), quantifying collaborative activity was nearly impossible. Now, tools like Microsoft 365, Google Suite, Slack, Salesforce, and GitHub generate vast data showing who is connecting and communicating within teams.

ONA can identify key connectors, highlight areas of isolation, and pinpoint communication breakdowns. However, it still doesn’t easily link these activities to financial metrics. It measures communication quantity, not quality. High volumes might indicate miscommunication, gossip, productive brainstorming, disengagement, or efficient alignment.

Organizational Development leaders face challenges in proving the impact of leadership programs on emotional intelligence and psychological safety, which are crucial for reducing turnover, increasing engagement, and accelerating innovation. Surveys can gauge sentiment but often fail to show direct ties to financial outcomes. This gap makes it hard to secure budget approval for development initiatives without leaders’ belief in the value of investing in people.

Unlocking the Potential of Quality Collaboration

Valuable collaboration is under-invested because we think of it in terms of quantity or channels rather than quality. We lack a common language and numerical proof linking it directly to profit. However, effective collaboration leads to profit and enhances the quality of life for employees and customers.

The convergence of macro-trends, SEC requirements for human capital considerations, and technological advancements present an opportunity to empower effective human skill interventions and measure high-quality collaboration’s impact.

The explosion of data and new techniques promises a future where we better understand how collaboration impacts productivity, innovation, and value creation. For now, approaches remain inconsistent across companies and teams.

At Cloverleaf, we have a front-row seat with millions of people in tens of thousands of teams across hundreds of organizations both large and small,  for what is working and what is ineffective in collaboration. We built Automated Coaching around proven concepts that work, grounded in decades of research and validated by real-world applications, resulting in quality collaboration, value creation, and life-changing outcomes. To see Cloverleaf in action or schedule a demo, click here.

Every team has a star player who exhibits enthusiasm and vision beyond their current role. A clear indication of this is when a direct report, during a 1-1 call, eagerly declares their intention: “They would like to be a manager!” This ambition is commendable but also prompts an essential question: Are they ready for the challenge?

Such aspirations reflect personal ambition and mirror the shifting expectations in modern workspaces. With platforms like LinkedIn showcasing management training success stories, there’s no shortage of inspiration. However, understanding and evaluating managerial readiness is critical. How can you determine if you or someone on your team is cut out for a management role? How does an organization measure this readiness, and what does it encompass?

Key Takeaways

  • The Multifaceted Nature of Managerial Readiness: Managerial readiness isn’t one-size-fits-all. Depending on the sector and organizational goals, defining what constitutes readiness requires understanding both technical expertise and leadership acumen.

  • Leadership Beyond Expertise: Being an expert in a particular domain doesn’t guarantee effective management. True leadership blends strategic foresight with interpersonal prowess, ensuring managers can inspire, guide, and set a vision.
  • Recognizing Potential Leaders: Identifying the next generation of managers is an art refined through observation and engagement—attributes such as active listening, emotional regulation, and a team-oriented approach signal managerial promise.
  • Cultivating Leadership from Within: Proactive nurturing of budding leaders through feedback, mentoring, and development opportunities ensures a robust future for the organization. Tailoring developmental programs and providing the necessary tools and resources are pivotal.
  • Investment in People Equals Organizational Resilience: In a rapidly changing landscape, an organization’s success hinges on its dedication to cultivating and championing its people’s growth and potential.
what is management readiness

What is management readiness?

The Multifaceted Nature of Leadership

Managerial readiness is not a monolithic concept—it varies based on the sector, organizational goals, and even the cultural context. For instance, what constitutes a successful manager in the field of manufacturing could be poles apart from what’s needed in marketing. At its core, the idea of managerial readiness revolves around an organization’s priorities and purpose.

Technical Know-How vs. Leadership Acumen

A prevalent misconception many companies fall victim to is the idea that subject matter expertise or technical knowledge is the sole criterion for a management position. While this know-how is undeniably valuable, it doesn’t inherently prepare one for a leadership role.

The truth is that being highly knowledgeable about a specific area is a strong asset, but it isn’t the sole indicator of effective managers. The management landscape is laden with experts who falter when placed in a leadership role. The essence of leadership goes beyond expertise; it’s about being able to inspire, guide, and set a vision for a team. Thus, managers must be LEADERS, combining their technical know-how and leadership skills. It’s about gauging leadership acumen—understanding that a manager’s responsibility is multi-dimensional, blending strategic foresight and interpersonal prowess.

Crafting A Blueprint of an Ideal Leader

To properly define managerial readiness in your organization, it’s crucial to invest time and effort in sketching out a profile of the ideal leadership figure for the job description. This profile serves as a benchmark for aspiring leaders and will aid in shaping organizational culture. To help you start, consider the following aspects to help you define what is essential to your team.

7 Key Considerations in Crafting Your Leadership Profile

  • Organizational Values: What ethos should leaders embody? How should they reflect and champion the organization’s values?
  • Interpersonal Dynamics: Leadership isn’t just about strategy; it’s about people. What interpersonal skills are paramount for success?
  • Guidance and Mentorship: Leaders shape their teams. How will they enhance both individual and collective performance?
  • Technical and Business Acumen: What degree of business or technical understanding is required for different levels of leadership?
  • Navigating Change: Leaders need adept change management and problem-solving skills to lead through change and uncertainty. What resources are available to support them?
  • Communication Skills: Beyond just conveying information, how should leaders foster a work environment of open dialogue and cross-functional collaboration?
  • Values Integration: A leader’s approach should align with the organization’s values. Whether it’s being approachable or offering timely feedback, how can these values be translated into daily actions?

Defining managerial readiness isn’t just about setting specific benchmarks or criteria. It’s about understanding the multifaceted nature of leadership and ensuring that the individuals being considered for managerial roles embody the technical expertise and leadership capabilities uniquely required in their specific domain. Each organization must critically examine what leadership means to them, what values and behaviors they cherish, and how they foresee leaders propelling the organization forward.

As we’ve outlined, managerial readiness goes beyond technical know-how and deepens into leadership acumen, interpersonal skills, organizational values, and adaptability to change. However, once this foundation is established, the next step is to recognize these attributes in potential leaders.

Up Next: Recognizing the traits of future managers and understanding the subtle yet impactful signs that someone is ready to lead.

Talent Development in the Age of AI

HUMAN SKILL PROGRAMS ARE HITTING LIMITATIONS...​

5 THINGS THIS FREE RESOURCE WILL TEACH YOU
signs someone is ready to become a manager

Recognizing Management Readiness

Lena, a seasoned manager at a fast-growing tech firm, often found herself silently observing the dynamics among her team. As a seasoned leader, she knew recognizing potential managers was an art honed through years of experience. As she settled into her chair for her regular one-on-one sessions with her team members, she couldn’t help but reflect on the subtle signs of leadership that had caught her attention.

She remembered Jacob, always the team player. He was the first to step in whenever the team was up against a tight deadline, offering assistance even if it meant going beyond his job description. His dedication was not just about completing tasks but genuinely ensuring the team’s success.

Then there was Sara, who had recently admitted to a mistake she made on a project. Her accountability stood out. Instead of deflecting the responsibility, she owned up to it, ensuring lessons were learned and similar errors were avoided in the future.

During team meetings, Lena noticed how Michael always listened intently, absorbing what others were saying without bringing the spotlight back to himself. Such active listening was a rare trait and spoke volumes about his potential as a manager.

Amidst the hustle and bustle of corporate life, it was Maria who set an example for work-life balance. She ensured her well-being was in check, understanding the significance of setting healthy boundaries. Her balanced approach was a testament to how she’d be able to lead without burning out, ensuring the well-being of those she leads.

Lena also recalled a recent presentation by Emma. The way she communicated complex ideas with such clarity and effectiveness left an impression on everyone in the room. Her peers respected her for her technical expertise and ability to connect effectively.

And when tensions ran high in the team, Raj showcased impeccable emotional intelligence. He’d ensure the atmosphere remained calm, diffusing potential conflicts and ensuring everyone was heard.

These observations led Lena to incorporate specific questions during her one-on-ones, subtly inquiring about their aspirations and sharing her comments about their leadership potential. She believed in nurturing leadership from within and took it upon herself to guide those budding leaders, even if they didn’t yet recognize their potential.

It’s in these everyday moments, through observation and active engagement, that leaders like Lena identify new managers. By paying attention to the nuances of team dynamics, they cultivate the next generation of leadership, ensuring a robust and visionary future for their organization.

 

7 Signs Someone Is Ready To Become A Manager

While expressing intent is a clear indicator of managerial aspiration, there are more subtle signs that individuals often exhibit, revealing their potential. Here are some signs that hint at a person’s readiness to step into a managerial role:
  1. Team player with a servant-minded approach. Proactively stepping up, especially during critical moments, showcases their dedication and willingness to go the extra mile.
  2. Willingness to take accountability for their actions. A budding leader isn’t the type to deflect responsibility or pass the buck. High-potential employees own their actions, develop new skills, and are able to admit mistakes.
  3. Skillful in active listening. Great listening skills are essential to leading others. People interested in just speaking and directing can find themselves disconnected from their teams. People who actively listen and don’t constantly bring the subject back to themselves may be great candidates for manager roles.
  4. Prioritize their own well-being and understand healthy boundaries around work. Healthy managers lead to healthy teams. Work is only part of life; it is not responsible for providing for all of our social and emotional needs. Someone who is constantly burning out or overly relying on the organization will have unrealistic expectations of the organization and of others.
  5. Able to effectively speak and communicate clearly. Great leaders communicate succinctly, clearly, to and with the right people and in a timely fashion.
  6. Well-respected by other team members. Earning respect from their team signifies an individual’s ability to create a comfortable and trusting environment. This trait is indicative of someone adept at forging strong and effective connections with others.
  7. Takes time to regulate their emotions. Effective leaders balance vulnerability with diplomacy, especially during challenging communications. They maintain composure and adeptly navigate tense situations to find resolutions.

Cultivating Leadership Potential

A leader can recognize an individual contributor with leadership promise by actively observing these attributes. Regular one-on-one meetings offer a platform to integrate development into everyday work conversations. It’s essential to share feedback about where you notice their leadership potential. Inquire about their vision for the future – do they see themselves leading? Even if they don’t have an immediate vision of stepping into management, continuous encouragement, validation, and guidance can help nurture their latent potential. The key is to stay persistent and committed to cultivating leadership abilities throughout the organization.

How Can You Support Someone Who Is Ready to Lead Or Manage?

When supporting those who are preparing to lead or manage, it’s important to articulate strengths and opportunities for growth. Whether a specific position is available, developing these individuals through stretch assignments, coaching, and project management opportunities is still important.

Guided conversations are a cornerstone of leadership development. Whether they’re part of a formal evaluation or casual check-ins, these dialogues can offer invaluable insights into an individual’s leadership trajectory. When engaging in such conversations with potential leaders, delve into these crucial areas:

how can you support someone who is ready to lead or manage

6 Supportive Ways To Develop New Managers

  1. Understanding Leadership Styles: Ask them to articulate their vision of leadership. Do they see themselves as more directive or leaning towards a supportive role? How familiar are they with a coaching style of leadership? Our Boss to Coach Playbook can offer more insights into this perspective.
  2. Harnessing Leadership Strengths: Encourage them to introspect and share their perceived leadership strengths. Discussing how they can further amplify these strengths in their current roles can yield actionable strategies.
  3. Addressing Leadership Challenges: Just as it’s essential to identify and build upon strengths, recognizing challenges or areas where they can grow is equally crucial. Setting concrete objectives to bridge these gaps can be a proactive step toward leadership readiness.
  4. Aligning with Organizational Leadership: Gauge their perception of an ideal leader within the organization’s context. Comparing this with the organization’s defined leadership profile can help align their aspirations and the organization’s expectations.
  5. Seeking Managerial Support: It is vital to understand the specific types of support they expect from their immediate supervisors. This can streamline their journey, ensuring they have the necessary resources and mentorship.
  6. Resource and Development Needs: Lastly, discuss the tools, resources, or training they feel would best assist them in their aspirations. This feedback can guide the organization in tailoring its developmental programs for maximum impact.

Cloverleaf: A One-Stop-Shop To Help Your People Be Their Best Selves

A Roadmap for Success

Once you’ve identified the traits and requirements, it’s time to lay down a roadmap for their journey to leadership.

    • Management Training: Consider introducing comprehensive management training programs. This will give them the necessary tools and knowledge to tackle new challenges.
    • Readiness Assessment Templates: Providing templates or frameworks for self-assessment can empower these potential leaders to regularly evaluate their progress and readiness.
    • Networking Opportunities: Encourage them to tap into the power of social media. Platforms like LinkedIn can be instrumental for young managers to connect, learn, and share insights with a global community of leaders.
    • Regular Feedback: Continuous, specific, and timely feedback can fast-track their development. This feedback loop ensures they’re always aligned with the organization’s goals and personal development trajectory.

By investing in their growth and providing a structured path, you’re not just preparing an individual for a managerial role but strengthening the entire organization’s leadership foundation.

Final Thoughts

Managerial readiness is a gradual transformation, a process nurtured over time by exceptional leadership. When stalwarts guide the leaders of tomorrow, the outcome is twofold: organizations not only retain their top talent but also harness their immeasurable potential.

In an era marked by constant flux, where challenges are ever-evolving and new opportunities emerge at every turn, it becomes increasingly evident that the true mark of an organization’s resilience and success is its investment in its people. Those who prioritize and champion this endeavor are the ones poised to navigate the future with confidence and vision.

Potential is such a loaded word and can be incredibly subjective. Yet we throw it around a lot in leadership development circles. In fact, multiple talent management models (including the popular 9 Box approach) use potential as a cornerstone element.

When leadership performance and potential are assessed and plotted on the graph, individuals in the upper right quadrant (Box 1) are identified as high-potential candidates for succession, while those in the lower left quadrant (Box 9) may need to be reassigned or removed from the organization.shrm.org

Identifying high-potential employees should be on the radar of every leader; however, using a definition for hipo (high-potential) team members that clarifies how your organization recognizes and retains top talent is crucial.

How to Identify High-Potential Employees

The most important thing your team can do to retain future leaders is move from a fixed mindset concerning high-potential employees to a growth mindset.

What actually is potential? According to the dictionary, it is “having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future.”

The problem talent management leaders face is we all have different definitions for what that something is. In other words, what is the “something” you are developing hipo individuals into?

Depending on the organization, role, experience, or your manager’s perspective, potential can mean many things.

One challenge with defining what is ‘potential’ in organizations is that the process of gauging it is elusive and imprecise — and can be highly subjective. And despite what some leaders would like to believe, potential does not equate to current or past performance.shrm.org.

What I typically hear when I ask others what they mean by the term potential is “management potential.” This definition implies that those who want a technical or craft-focused role have no potential for that organization over the intermediate or long term. 

And this is precisely why using potential as a key component of talent evaluation is so dangerous. The criteria for how a CTO evaluates potential relative to a Sales Manager or Marketing Leader vary widely. 

This mentality is a fixed mindset approach to talent evaluation that only sees the world in black and white (possibly with some limited shades of gray) instead of being full of vibrant color.

what do you want employees to have high potential for

What Do You Want Employees To Have High Potential For?

Limiting a team member’s potential to a specific role will decrease your ability to mentor growth opportunities that are much more expansive than a position and more valuable to your organization.

If your only lens for evaluating potential is fixed according to your organization’s immediate needs rather than using a spectrum that empowers top talent to contribute and even create new ways of providing value, you will hinder future leaders.

…science reveals that regardless of the context, job, and industry, such individuals tend to share a range of measurable qualities, which can be identified fairly early in the process. hbr.org

Another definition of potential is “qualities or abilities that may be developed and lead to future success.” I like this definition much better, and it should represent how talent management views the potential of their workforce.

To identify high-potential employees, leaders must expand their definition of potential to include room for the unique value that every team member offers. Next, mentor hipo individuals to empower them to contribute significantly to the organization.

The reality is that everyone on your team has potential. At Cloverleaf, we have a saying that ‘everyone has value.’

How our team aligns this value with the organization’s needs is fluid. We work to manage this dynamic rather than control it because we believe it grants freedom for our team to contribute their best work uniquely.

Would you rather help develop someone’s potential towards a fixed expectation or increase their capacity to add value?

Strictly adhering to labels like potential without mentoring team members to develop their unique leadership will minimize or cap the value each person brings to our teams and organizations.

Talent Development in the Age of AI

HUMAN SKILL PROGRAMS ARE HITTING LIMITATIONS...​

5 THINGS THIS FREE RESOURCE WILL TEACH YOU

3 Effective Ways To Ensure You Consistently Develop High-Potential Employees To Provide Value

Adopting the belief that everyone has value (or potential) will impact how we lead, build culture, and make talent decisions. Doing so can help leaders increase collaboration and productivity as they choose to honor, empower, and coach hipo employees.

Here are three ways to effectively build a culture of developing high-potential employees:

1. Prioritize Coaching For Your Team That Is Personalized And Values-Based.

The Cloverleaf team uses our integrated coaching product to constantly reinforce these unique elements of value brought by each team member in a way that broadens everyone’s view of potential over time.

For example, imagine helping your team to further realize their strengths and those of their teammates.

Providing your team with relevant insights into themselves and those they work with will boost self-awareness, strengthen collaborative efforts, and minimize workplace drama.

2. Embed Recognition Of One Another’s Unique Value Into Your Teams Rhythms And Rituals.

Creating a practice that habituates celebrating team members’ competencies and accomplishments is a powerful way to supplement your employee development strategy.

This practice can include an all-team lunch weekly through Zoom, shout-outs that are rewarded with bonus opportunities, quarterly all-team off-sites, and regular team coaching sessions.

3. Allow Team Members Roles To Evolve Based On Their Motivation And Strengths.

Facilitating space for individuals to pivot within your organization that aligns with their giftings and natural drivers organically creates development opportunities for your entire team.

Although Cloverleaf is a smaller team, we have a track record of Internal mobility where roles evolve as stronger recognition of an individual’s strengths and interests surface. Repeatedly, we experience the benefits of innovation and engagement by permitting these types of transitions.

In Summary

It’s possible to limit your team’s potential by limiting your definition of what it means to develop it.

We should expand the definition of potential and create pathways for everyone to understand the unique value inherent in each of us and seek to align that with the needs of our organizations.

Stop using antiquated methods to identify high-potential employees according to the organization’s current needs. I encourage talent and people leaders to develop potential by fostering and coaching the inherent value each member offers your team.

You can begin the journey of multiplying your team’s potential by starting a free trial with Cloverleaf today.